The request is one sentence inside a conversation you were already having, and the picture comes back from the companion you were talking to rather than from an empty prompt box. This page is about what that is actually like, what the image is of, what it costs you, and the places where it stops.
You are twenty minutes into a conversation and she has just described where she is sitting. You want to see it. Not a stock photo, not a grid of strangers with the wrong faces, her, in the thing she just said. So you type the request and send it like any other message. What happens next is the subject of this page: what comes back, what it is a picture of, what it costs, and where it stops.
Most image tools start from an empty box. You write a description, a stranger appears, and if you want the same woman tomorrow you describe her again and hope. The face drifts, the hair changes length, and whatever you liked about the last picture is gone, because there was never anybody there, only a sentence you tried to type twice.
Asking inside a conversation is a different act. There is already a person on the other end of it, with a name, an age, a city, a job and a way of talking, and the request is aimed at her rather than at a model. You are not describing a woman from scratch, you are asking one for a photo, and the sentence is short because the conversation did most of the work.
That is also why the reply arrives in character: the picture lands with whatever she says about sending it, one message rather than a download and a receipt. If you want the category rather than the doing, the NSFW image generator page covers that ground. This one stays on the practical side.
You send a message like any other. There is a short wait, longer than a reply because a picture is being made rather than typed, and then the image appears in the thread above her text. If it fails, and occasionally it does, the thread says so in that spot instead of leaving you with a blank square.
The request is written in words, not settings. There is no slider, no style menu and no negative prompt field. You say what you want to see the way you would say it to a person, and how specific you are willing to be decides most of the rest.
This is the part that surprises people. Every one of the 125 companions carries her own image description in the data behind her: face, eyes, hair, build, colouring, and a fixed starting number the image model uses every time. Akari Tanaka is eighteen, a fashion model in Tokyo with long straight black hair and a heart shaped face, and her pictures are built from that rather than from yours. Eva Novakova is forty two, a cardiologist in Prague, and she does not come back looking twenty.
So your words do not describe the woman. They describe the situation she is in: where she is, what she is wearing or not wearing, the pose, the light, what her face is doing. Her identity is already fixed and arrives with the picture, which is why the second photo looks like the first.
All 125 allow adult conversation and all 125 send adult content. That is not a subset who opted in, it is a pair of flags true on every character file, from the model in Tokyo to the cardiologist in Prague to Carmen Delgado, the wine entrepreneur in Barcelona. There is no separate adult section to find first.
Worth laying out plainly, because it is easy to shop for one of these while expecting the other.
| What you are doing | A generator with a prompt box | Asking her in the thread |
|---|---|---|
| Describing the woman | Every time, in full, and she drifts anyway | Never, her description is stored against her |
| Length of the request | A paragraph of tags and weights | One sentence, the context is already there |
| What arrives | A file on its own, in a results grid | A photo in the thread with what she says about it |
| Coming back tomorrow | A stranger who half matches your notes | The same face, from the same fixed number |
| What steers the result | Sliders, styles, seeds, negative prompts | Words, and how specific you were willing to be |
| Where it stops | At the download | At the browser tab, with no video and no call |
The last row is the one to read twice. The right hand column wins on continuity and on how little you type, and loses everywhere a control panel would have helped.
The gap between a picture you keep and one you scroll past is almost never the model. It is how much of the situation you were willing to put into words. Five steps, and the first two are the ones people skip.
The picture is only ever as specific as the sentence that asked for it, and the sentence gets to be short because the conversation already said the rest.
Five messages a month without paying. That is the free tier in full, it resets with the calendar month, and it is counted on the server against your account rather than in your browser, so clearing anything locally does not move it.
Here is the caveat that matters more than the pricing, and it is the opposite of what people expect. Image generation is not gated by the plan. The tool that makes the picture is built for every signed in account, with no subscription check anywhere near it. The only thing the plan changes is the message ceiling, and asking for a photo spends a message like any other line you send.
So the arithmetic is this. Free gives you five messages a month, a picture costs one, and that is enough to find out what an image looks like and close to nothing else. Premium is twenty dollars a month, twenty four dollars a quarter, or sixty dollars a year, and it removes the ceiling. You are buying room to talk, and the images become usable as a consequence. For the same limit from the other side, chatting free walks through what five messages gets you.
The rest is the same on either plan. It runs in a browser with nothing to install, conversations are saved and resume where you left them, and only your own account can read them.
Every one of these pages carries a section like this, and it is not throat clearing. Read it before you pay.
One more that belongs here rather than in small print. If the reason you are here is a stretch of real isolation rather than an ordinary evening, a picture will not touch it, and that deserves a doctor or a crisis line in your country rather than a subscription. This is entertainment for adults over eighteen, and it is not treatment.
Yes, and it is worth saying how widely. Every one of the 125 companions carries two flags in her data file, one for adult conversation and one for sending adult content, and both are true on all 125 with no exceptions. There is no subset of the roster that participates and no switch to find first. You ask in the thread and the picture is generated there.
No, and this is the part most people have backwards. The image tool is built for every signed in account with no subscription check anywhere near it, so a free account can ask on its first message. What a free account runs out of is messages, not images. You can generate a picture without paying, but not many, because each one spends a message from an allowance of five.
Five a month, and yes, a photo spends one of the five like any other message. The counter resets with the calendar month, and an unused month does not carry forward. It is counted on the server against your account rather than in the browser, so clearing local data does not reset it. Five is enough to see what the pictures look like and not enough to use the product.
Yes, as far as the model can manage it. Each companion carries a written description of her face, hair, build and colouring, plus a fixed starting number the image model uses every time, so pictures are built from her rather than from what you typed. Anastasia Volkova comes back as Anastasia Volkova. Small things move between images, but it is nothing like retyping a description into an empty box and hoping.
There is no style menu, and it is better to know that before you look for one. Every companion's stored image description is written as a photoreal portrait, so realistic is what the pictures are by default. Anything else has to go into the words of your request, and how far that carries varies. If an illustrated companion is what you came for, an anime girlfriend takes that on directly.
No. There is no editor, no inpainting brush, no variation button and no way to feed a picture back in and adjust it. What you can do is say what was wrong and ask again, which is closer to talking to a person than to using a tool. The specificity has to go into the request rather than into a correction afterwards, which is why the third step above matters.
No. There is no video generation of any kind, no animation of a still image, no voice calls, no phone calls and no video calls, and no plan adds them. This is text plus still images generated inside the conversation, and that is the entire surface of it. If a moving picture or a voice is what you are here for, it is a better use of tonight to know now.
Nobody. The images are written into storage under your own account and the conversation they sit in is readable only by that account, enforced by the security rules rather than by a promise in a policy document. There is no feed, no public gallery and no shared timeline, so there is nowhere for anything to be posted even by accident. No other user can open your thread.
No. All 125 are women, each written with her own history, job and way of talking, and no setting changes that. There is also no way to build one of your own from a blank form, so the cast is the cast: 125 characters, 23 marked premium in the data, spread across more than thirty nationalities, with 13 American, 6 Brazilian, 6 Colombian and 6 Spanish the largest groups.
Twenty dollars a month, twenty four dollars a quarter, or sixty dollars a year, which is five dollars a month billed yearly. What it buys is unlimited messages, and that is the whole difference. Image generation, saved conversations, the full roster of 125 and the privacy of your threads are on a free account already. Premium removes the ceiling of five, and since every picture costs a message, that is what makes the rest usable.
If what you wanted was a picture that comes out of a conversation rather than out of a blank field, the way to find out whether it lands is to pick somebody and talk for a while first. Have a look and meet the companions.
